Banning Runners' Use of Headphones in Races

The November 1 New York Times ran an article, Rule Jostles Runners Who Race to Their Tune>, that said USA Track and Field has banned headphones and portable audio players from its official races. The article points out that this rule is difficult, if not impossible, to enforce and that elite runners shun the use of such devices. The article further suggests that USA Track and Field instituted this ban in order to be able to get liability insurance coverage.

While I can certainly understand USA Track and Field's concern about potential liability, I wonder if this ban will discourage ordinary recreational runners from getting the exercise they need for good health by running in preparation for organized races and in such races. Two of my reasons for optimism about the future of fitness in America is that technology has made it possible for people to be entertained with such devices as they exercise and that there are now increasing numbers of opportunities for Americans to compete in organized athletic events after high school and college. If people think they will not be able to entertained and even motivated to finish their races with the banned devices, they may be discouraged from participating in them and training for them. Let's face it exercise is boring for many people and these devices are a good way to overcome the boredom.

When cycling, I do not use headphones, and I shudder when I see other cyclists use them because the music may drown out the sound of overtaking cars or trucks. This could also be a concern for runners running on streets and roads. However, in running races, the streets are usually closed to vehicular traffic, so that the only hazard would be collision with other runners--not likely to cause serious injury.